The Town of Sundre's subdivision and development appeal board has heard an appeal regarding a proposed 33-unit apartment building at 503 – 6th St. in southwest Sundre.
A group of area residents launched an appeal with the board in July, asking the board to overturn a 10 metre to 12.09 metre height variance granted earlier by the municipal planning commission.
The group also asked that a variance from 58 stalls to 52 stalls granted earlier be rejected.
The board heard the appeal at the town office on Tuesday. The meeting was chaired by board member Roy Cummings.
Erin O'Neill, the town's planning and development manager, told the board that “Given the location of the building on site, the landscaping, and the fencing it is expected that upholding the decision of the municipal planning commission and approving the development with the two requested variances will not have an impact on use, amenity, enjoyment or value of the neighbouring properties.
“The planning and development department recommends that the subdivision and development appeal board uphold the decision of the municipal planning commission and approve development permit 2012-020 with variances to height and parking.”
Appellant spokesperson Jerry Moore told the board that nearby residents believe the new three-storey building would block out too much sunshine for some residents near the site during winter months.
He also said the complex would create parking and other traffic problems in the area.
Area resident Rob Rosevear told the board he does not believe the new building “fits in with other trailers and homes in the area.”
Appearing in opposition to the application, the builder told the board that there would be no application made to have special off-street parking at the site.
The builder also said that the additional height on the building was made to allow for a peaked roof, which the owners believe is more esthetically pleasing than a flat roof.
The board ruled that the variance on the height on the building could remain in place. The board also ruled that the facility must have 56 parking stalls.
Following the decision Moore said he was disappointed with the rule but did not plan any further action on the matter.
